For less
recent
fare,
consult the
archives
at left.

Times Past

I’m watching a documentary on the new Doctor Who; in it is a retrospective of all the previous Doctors, and in that is enough footage to remind me why I like McGann’s. It’s a shame he never got more time; with some refinement he could have been close to the best. Almost ideal.

McGann’s was the emotional Doctor. It seems, after seven lives and a terrifying regeneration, something finally hit him. He becomes wistful, pensive, idealistic. At one point, he actually kisses his companion. It feels like he’s started to grasp the value of this life, of his whole situation. Of what it all means. He is sad, and fragile — and appreciative of everything. I guess he realizes that he might not have as much time as he’s always thought. Which must be weird, for a time lord.

All of the pieces are there. A roundness, a sense of dimension and balance. He gives the impression he’s looked through his past and decided who he is, and what matters to him. McGann brings a certain poignance to the whole arc of the series; he seems to imply that it’s going somewhere, that it has some internal structure, that there is some real evolution going on in the character. That we’ve been building to this moment. He makes it easier to go back and extrapolate, to get a piece of the Doctor’s mind. Just enough to understand him as a person, without robbing him of his mystery.

I say all this as I learn that Eccleston has ditched the role after a single season. After he leapfrogged all of the other actors in line to ask for the role, after he decided past Doctors were too foppish and that he wanted to modernize the character, and after exactly one episode has aired (to ten million viewers), away he goes. That’s… I mean. Hell. If you’re not up for commitment, then why bother with Doctor Who? Of all series? I taste lemons. There’s something weird when a companion hangs around longer than the Doctor himself.

This stunt puts Eccleston second to McGann in brevity, though McGann is to no blame for his part. Colin Baker was yanked out by the teeth, too. And McCoy just had the series cancelled on him. When Davison signed up, he only wanted to do three years; that was supposed to be a short run. And when his time was almost up, he regretted his earliier decision. So — yeah. Eccleston’s in a class of his own. Recall that the character is supposed to be running out of regenerations, and make of him what you will.

I still want to see McGann again. Surely there is some backstory to patch up here. We never did find out what happened to him — and there is plenty precedent for crossover.

EDIT: Or did we? I wasn’t aware that McGann had taped four full “seasons” of audio episodes. I knew he’d done some more work with the character; that these are actually considered seasons 27-30, however, is new to me. And this final episode was only released in December.

Well. Hell, then. I need to get ahold of these. I wonder how.

EDIT AGAIN: Jesus. It turns out that, after all of the novels and audio plays and junk, McGann is the second most well-recorded Doctor of all (following at 116 to McCoy’s 120). And a lot of stuff has happened during his era. And after the second episode of the new series, it seems that Davies considers it all canon. So maybe he hasn’t done that poorly after all. I still would like to see him in action again.



Entertainment

I have only been out of the country twice. This might seem strange for a Mainer, as Maine is right on the Canadian border. It’s only a short drive, and there you are in Quebec. I don’t drive, though, and I have never really had any friends near enough, mobile enough, and spontaneous enough to go places with. I’m so unused to the concept that even now, when people I know live only a dollar and a quarter away, it never really occurs to me to “hang out” with them. I just don’t grasp the concept, too well. I have my space; other people have their own. I don’t bother people; they don’t bother me. When you go out of your way to visit someone, you have to find ways to be entertaining. You have to find things to say. You have to make room. No matter how much you like a person, it’s awkward. I have my own things to do; I assume so do other people. Unless I’ve got something specific to share, I figure there’s no need to waste their time and energy in placating me, when I’m better able to amuse myself. Let’s say that it’s more efficient this way.

The one time I left the continent, I went to the UK. I went with a theater group from high school; we played Godspell for our sister school in Kent. Godspell has two roles, really: Jesus and Judas. I was neither Jesus nor Judas. I signed up for the play to avoid sports; I signed up for the England trip because, hey, England. I hated my time there. You see, we were to stay with host families; the host I stayed with was a twentysomething guy with black-and-white checked pants who got the (mostly accurate) impression that all the American kids wanted to do was go to pubs, since the drinking age was only sixteen. I was unassertive, so I was bored. I got dragged from one dingy, smoke-filled pit to another; as others inebriated themselves, I slouched in corners and tried to sleep. People treated me as an infant because I found none of this interesting. My host was furious with me. I avoided people as much as I could. On a couple of occasions, I slipped off, to wander my own way through London. I always found my way back; I’m fine with direction, so long as I have no one to confuse me. This did not stop people from panicking, since, after all, I was the infant of the group. I weathered the abuse, as those moments were all the peace I had.

Now I live on my own. I’m in a city I enjoy, in a state I generally don’t. Although the place is still new to me, I have come to own it — or some piece of it. It’s home in a sense that I have not had before. When I go out, it is to familiarize myself. To learn, to incorporate. To explore. To claim more. To give myself more right to be here. This is a mundane task, and a subtle one. It involves climbing steps and admiring rusted metal. It involves watching old Japanese men build towers of rocks in the rising tide that by all reason should not balance the way they stack them. It involves riding sixty-year-old streetcars just to go west a few blocks. It involves finding stores I like and never entering them, so that I might one day. Small things. Sincere things. The grandiose rarely factors into life.

I am always confused when people ask me what there is to do, here. How should I know? I only live here. I know they’re not looking for tourist spots, because that stuff’s easy to find. I know they’re not interested in the things I’m interested in, because if they were, they wouldn’t have to ask — or they’d be more specific. They’d ask, “So I forget — what museums do you have around there?” or “Where can I find some good pizza?” or even “So where did The Maltese Falcon take place?” These are people with interests, and therefore interesting people. When someone asks “what is there to do?”, what it seems to translate to is “I’m bored, so where can I go to get drunk?”

If that were the question right off, at least it would show interest. It would show some decisiveness. Although I don’t identify with it, it’s a question I can repect as far as it goes. What am I to make of this euphemism, though? What does it betray when someone equates “doing something” with getting piss-faced? Beyond a lack of imagination? What am I to make that I am expected to understand the code? What are the set of assumptions at play here? To be frank, this kind of scares me. Not for my own sake, mind. It’s just: are people really this boring? I don’t look much outside my own circle, so I don’t have much basis for reference. I start to think maybe I really haven’t been missing much, the last twenty-six years. And I start to understand aspects of culture that I kind of wish I didn’t. Or to think I do.

See. If I tend to hide, I figure it’s just because of the way I operate. It’s my own fault, my own decision to wall myself away like this. I just work best that way — and, you know, I do. Things like this, though — they make me question why I really do it. To wonder if I really do have a choice in the matter at all. Is there no way back for me? Was there no other way I could have gone? Can I be so far removed?

If you have to ask what there is to do, you will never really know. Especially if you ask me. Please don’t ask me. Ask me where to find fudge, or where to rent an obscure movie. Ask me where there’s a midnight show, or what’s a really pretty place to watch the sunset. Maybe I won’t know. Maybe I will. Maybe we can find the answer together. Just know what you want out of life. Show me I’m not alone.



Shoulda used RenderWare

You know how, at the start of Space Harrier, the announcer says “Welcome to the Fantasy Zone. Get ready!”?

In the Sega Ages remake, it’s a little different. He says, “GET BUSY, HARRIER! DRAGON LAND IS SCREAMING!!

That tells you most of what you need to know.



Sweat Meats

Okay, so white chocolate is chocolate made without the cocoa solids. Because of the lack of cocoa powder, it’s not considered chocolate as-such by the FDA (and other such organizations). Because of this in turn, it can be made with other materials in place of (the relatively healthful) cocoa butter — like, say, hydrogenated vegetable oil — and still be labeled “white chocolate”.

This deal with cocoa butter is also a major differentiation between chocolate and fudge. Fudge is actually kind of a variant of caramel (the candy, not the burned sugar). To make caramel, you boil milk and sugar together — otherwise also important ingredients in milk chocolate — to what is known in confectionary circles as the “soft ball” stage. To make fudge, you then beat the mixture while it cools. So fudge is basically beaten caramel that tends to (though need not) be flavored with cocoa powder. In contrast, to call something “chocolate”, it needs to be based entirely on chocolate products — mainly, cocoa powder and cocoa butter.* Considering that fudge need not contain any chocolate product, this does not describe fudge. Actually they’re pretty far apart, as far as confections go.

While we’re here, the difference between toffee and taffy basically comes down to one minor detail of production; they tend to be made from the same recipe (basically a caramel one, with butter), and by the same process. The only thing is, taffy is pulled as it cools, aerating it and making it chewy. Salt water taffy was invented (or at least popularized) in Atlantic City. I guess that explains why it’s so much more common on the east coast than over here. And why it’s all over the place when you go to the Jersey boardwalks. It doesn’t really contain salt water. Or even any more salt than other candy contains.

*: Chocolate liquor is the natural result of grinding cocoa beans to a smooth state; it consists of what would otherwise be extracted separately as powder and butter.



I just got MGS3, new, for $24.00 and free shipping.

Actually. The Metal Gear Solid games are pretty
damned comedic, in what they allow the player to do, in terms of the
environment. And in terms of how they subvert the expected form of
interaction, for a game of that sort and for videogames in general.
It’s similar to the way that a pun subverts language. Those who aren’t
impressed with subversion, and just want people to speak plainly, tend
to hate puns, while those who like playing with the nature of
communication take some delight in them. I suppose it takes some level
of virtuosity with the medium of communication at hand (as well as a
playful sense of humor to start with) to appreciate them, rather than
to be puzzled and annoyed.

The best subversive humor comes with a straight face, of course.