For less
recent
fare,
consult the
archives
at left.

She Caught Me Off My Guard

I’ve mostly avoided Nirvana, out of that associative thing. It was never “my” music; it always belonged to people I didn’t like. Or if I did like them, they clung to it too tightly. So I didn’t really have a part in that relationship.

What makes it a little stranger is I think Nirvana was the first contemporary pop act I was made aware of. That was 1993-1994, my sophomore year of high school. I listened to a couple of songs off of In Utero, and thought, well, this is different. Although the origin of this awareness was a gaggle of individuals whom I would hesitate to trust alone with a cat and a can of lighter fluid, I was willing to accept their own interest as coincidence. Then, of course, the moment I began to pay attention, Kurt went and killed himself. All the noise and deification caused me to shrug and walk away.

Years later, when I was trying in earnest to figure out this music thing, I picked up Muddy Banks of the Wishkah — there was a little hype around its release, and I figured I’d give the band another shot. And… er. It sounded like it was recorded from within a cardboard box placed outside the security doors of the theater in which the band was playing. And it wasn’t exactly the most rounded selection of material. And it was overlong. Again, I could tell there was something there, but. Well, whatever.

Later, an ex-girlfriend had one of those creepy fetishistic things for Kurt Cobain. As people do. Which again bade me hold the band at arm’s distance.

Now, here we are. The last ten months I’ve been trying hard to become myself; to break all these ties and expectations. Make my own context.

So. Six albums, I guess, are the “canon”: the three real albums, Incesticide, and the live ones. I’m starting with Mtv Unplugged, because I’m not in the mood for heavy guitars right now.

And yeah. This is legitimate.

I kind of feel like I’m claiming something that was cheated from me. Like I’m filling in a blank in my life.



“this game will take you to its house and let you bang its sister”

eric-jon: Yes, that sounds like Gears of War.
Also maybe God of War.
Not so sure about Glory of War or Granola of War.
Andrew: granules of war
eric-jon: Gramophone of War
Andrew: gargles of war
eric-jon: Gomorrah of War (say it out loud for extra entertainment!)
Andrew: gonnorhea of war
eric-jon: Glaucoma of War
That would be sort of like a fog of war, except blearier.
Andrew: glare of war
eric-jon: Glamour of War
Andrew: glamrock of war
eric-jon: Goliath of War
Gucci of War
Andrew: gonads of war
eric-jon: Grab-Bag of War
Andrew: godfrey of war
gilbert godfrey of war
eric-jon: Grits of War
Gristle of War
Andrew: grog of war
greens of war
grumbles of war
goats of war
eric-jon: Grease of War
Gall of War
Gaul of War
Andrew: girls of war
guns of war?
eric-jon: Garment of War
Andrew: glib of war
eric-jon: Grouch of War
Andrew: gooch of war
gust of war
eric-jon: Grass of War
Andrew: gang of war
glass of war
eric-jon: Glomp of War
Andrew: ugh
that makes me wanna run for cover
eric-jon: Ha!
Goons of War
Andrew: goods of war
gimps of war
eric-jon: Goop of War
Grandstand of War
Andrew: ganja of war
guitars of war
eric-jon: Gibbons of War
Gams of War
Andrew: globs of war
eric-jon: Gestalt of War
Andrew: there it is
eric-jon: Gestalt of War?
Yes, that does bridge several possibilities.
I was going to say, Grandiloquence of War?
Andrew: hmmm
eric-jon: I want a game called RAW WAR.
The protagonist would be named Racecar.
Andrew: I like where this is going
eric-jon: Unfortunately, the levels would be structured like Halo.
Andrew: synecdoche, new earth



Patchwork of platitudes

Bad side: Low sugar day or something. Argh. What’s wrong with me.

Good side: I continue to like the layout of Play. And the new cover (May) is spiffy. And these (April and May) are two of the better articles I’ve written, probably, for this magazine.



At the risk of turning all Lucas…

It’s never really been quantified how regeneration works. People kind of assume there’s an objective limit, like he’s got so many magic potions in his inventory. Use one, and it’s gone. I dunno. That only makes sense as a plot device. Which, granted, is exactly what regeneration is. Still, no need to be that blatant.

The way I’ve taken it is that each regeneration is kind of like a mutation. You can only go so far before your system gets so screwed up that any further change is a humongous risk at best.

“The End of the World” implies that Eccleston has nine different DNA strands in him. Carry that forward, and I can imagine how that might get tangled after a certain point.

In that case the limit isn’t based in some kind of volume of opportunities for the spending so much as in the consequences of having regenerated.

There are other interpretations. Perhaps the cells of each incarnation are sort of impregnated with a certain amount of energy, that can be set off for regeneration. Once it’s spent, it’s spent. Let’s say that, as of “Journey’s End”, Tennant has now half-regenerated. To finish regenerating, perhaps he needs a kick-start from Donna, as he has already blown his proverbial wad. Which will leave each of his next two incarnations with a new set of cells, with their own preset regeneration bombs. As it were. Thus presently bringing him to thirteen.

Maybe there’s something kind of like super-mitochondria in a Time Lord cell. From my understanding, in a human cell the mitochondrion acts as a power source. If there were a similar sort of organelle in a Time Lord cell, that in an emergency were to rupture, releasing a certain potent energy, intended to completely reform the cell — well, that might work. The reformed cell would, naturally enough, have its own version of that organelle.

Actually, looking up mitochondria on Wikipedia — they deal with cell death, control of the cell cycle and cell growth… Yeah.

If we were to assume something like that, then Tennant will have perhaps wasted all that energy without it making over his cells — so therefore he can’t regenerate again until he has been regenerated. Which would still leave his future incarnations free to regenerate, as they would have fresh cells, with their own regeneration-energy organelles.



Engendering regeneration

So in effect most of the Doctors represent a different relationship.

01: Grandfather
02: Uncle
03: Father
04: Roommate
05: Big brother
06: Spouse?
07: Uncle
08: Best friend
09: Stepdad
10: Crush?

Most of them are pretty obvious and overt. Not really sure how to classify either Colin Baker or Tennant, though.

Colin Baker — there’s an element of that over-familiarity and antagonism from living with someone. Yet there’s a certain codependance. Similar to a roommate figure, similar to a father figure, similar to a sibling. Anyway: frayed nerves, underlaid by a certain intimacy. Strained affection. There’s a history here, yet the constant sense of obligation has taken its toll.

And Tennant is just — he seems to be the do-him-or-be-him guy. There’s a certain aspirational quality.